W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > November 2007

RE: ISSUE-3: REPORTED: Lack of anonymous individuals

From: Conrad Bock <conrad.bock@nist.gov>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:51:36 -0500
To: "'Bijan Parsia'" <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "'Boris Motik'" <boris.motik@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: "'Jim Hendler'" <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, "'OWL Working Group WG'" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <05d401c82238$64397820$b3200681@MEL.NIST.GOV>

Bijan, et al,

 > It's a surprise, isn't it? I find it to be a surprise for lots and
 > lots of people. I sometimes I feel I spend half my time explaining
 > this point and the various (usually undesirable) consequences.

Certinaly if it's meaning remains more an unnamed individual, then a
different term than "anonymous" should be used.

Received on Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:52:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:42:00 UTC