Sumamry: I am not ready to discuss issues 5 and 53 (n-ary datatypes), please defer for a week. Hi Bijan: > I don't see that we can usefully start defining built-in n-ary > datatype predicates until it's decided that we'll have them, so if > Jeremy could get some cycles to consider my recapitulation of his > (and David Turner's) objections, that would be helpful. And Ian has added an agendum: # # Issue 5 and Issue 53 (n-ary datatypes) in http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference.2007.11.07/Agenda#Agenda This week I am having extensive HP internal discussions concerning n-ary datatypes, I also need to contact Dave Turner (who has now left HP). I would strongly prefer it if, as a working group, we do not discuss this agendum this week, but leave it for next, when I will be better informed. I trust we can make good progress on some other items. Thanks JeremyReceived on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 12:41:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT