The question would be where adding specific properties to the OWL spec is appropriate versus those properties being defined in some standard ontology. I don't know what the answer is. Would be interested in seeing the list of candidate properties... -Alan On 11/1/07, Novacek, Vit <vit.novacek@deri.org> wrote: > > > > > > OK, so you are just asking for more annotation properties, similar to > > owl:versionInfo. Correct? > > Basically, yes. But I'm much rather humbly asking the group for > considering > this proposal and its reasonability than insisting on that we must have > this... > > I'm on holiday now, so I unfortunately don't have much time to elaborate > on motivations for this and on respective suggested set of such > properties. > However, I'd work out an initial proposal of the extension of annotation > properties before the December F2F, if the group found it useful... > > Cheers, > Vit > >Received on Thursday, 1 November 2007 16:29:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT