> OK, so you are just asking for more annotation properties, similar to > owl:versionInfo. Correct? Basically, yes. But I'm much rather humbly asking the group for considering this proposal and its reasonability than insisting on that we must have this... I'm on holiday now, so I unfortunately don't have much time to elaborate on motivations for this and on respective suggested set of such properties. However, I'd work out an initial proposal of the extension of annotation properties before the December F2F, if the group found it useful... Cheers, VitReceived on Thursday, 1 November 2007 16:23:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:27 GMT