W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-wg@w3.org > December 2007

Re: Fragments - specific proposal

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 11:46:39 +0100
Message-ID: <475D190F.8090809@w3.org>
To: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
Cc: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>


Carsten Lutz wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Jim Hendler wrote:
> 
>> 2 - RDFS 3.0
>> I propose we name a subset called RDFS 3.0 which is less than OWL Lite
>> - aimed primarily at universals - i.e. named classes and properties,
>> no restriction statements involved.
>> There should be a version of this which is provably polynomial within
>> certain restrictions (at least no redefinition of the language
>> features, possibly
> 
> Then it would IMHO be appropriate if some of the supporters of RDFS
> 3.0 would state precisely what this tractable fragment is and prove
> that it is tractable. Otherwise, I feel I am discussing a ghost.
>

I think Jim refers to:

http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Fragments

which posted some times ago.

Ivan


-- 

Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf


Received on Monday, 10 December 2007 10:46:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:13:29 GMT