Many thanks for making this link, Bijan and Timothy. I should have been watching the OWL Dev list and Wiki. I've just been in the trenches a lot over the last several weeks trying to wrestle with the fact that - for a variety of reasons - I'm still stuck working in OWL 1.0 and with Protege 3.x and need for these issues to be worked out in that environment, if that is at all possible. At least, I need to find some tractable workaround until we are ready to move to OWL v1.1 and Protege 4. Cheers, Bill On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote: > Tim, > > The message was appropriate and timely. I just posted a similar > note to the public-owl-wg list in preparation for discussion of > imports that the F2F (next week): > <http://www.w3.org/mid/70484C1D-4A28-4EB7-8062- > FAE426B1FEF5@cs.man.ac.uk> > > You can see it's on the agenda: > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/F2F.2007.12-Manchester/Agenda > "14:00 - 15:45 Imports requirements and Rich Annotations (see also > OWL Metamodeling) > > The relevant issue number seems to be ISSUE-15. > > I've added your email to the list on the WG Wiki page: > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Imports > > Your proposal is very similar to how schemaLocation works and is > also elaborated upon in my email. > > Cheers, > Bijan. > William Bug, M.S., M.Phil. email: wbug@ncmir.ucsd.edu Ontological Engineer (Programmer Analyst III) work: (610) 457-0443 Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN) and National Center for Microscopy & Imaging Research (NCMIR) Dept. of Neuroscience, School of Medicine University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive La Jolla, CA 92093 Please note my email has recently changed
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2007 18:09:01 UTC