Re: problems with imports

Many thanks for making this link, Bijan and Timothy.

I should have been watching the OWL Dev list and Wiki.  I've just  
been in the trenches a lot over the last several weeks trying to  
wrestle with the fact that - for a variety of reasons - I'm still  
stuck working in OWL 1.0 and with Protege 3.x and need for these  
issues to be worked out in that environment, if that is at all  
possible.  At least, I need to find some tractable workaround until  
we are ready to move to OWL v1.1 and Protege 4.

Cheers,
Bill

On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:51 AM, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> Tim,
>
> The message was appropriate and timely. I just posted a similar  
> note to the public-owl-wg list in preparation for discussion of  
> imports that the F2F (next week):
> 	<http://www.w3.org/mid/70484C1D-4A28-4EB7-8062- 
> FAE426B1FEF5@cs.man.ac.uk>
>
> You can see it's on the agenda:
> 	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/F2F.2007.12-Manchester/Agenda
> 	"14:00 - 15:45 Imports requirements and Rich Annotations (see also  
> OWL Metamodeling)
>
> The relevant issue number seems to be ISSUE-15.
>
> I've added your email to the list on the WG Wiki page:
> 	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Imports
>
> Your proposal is very similar to how schemaLocation works and is  
> also elaborated upon in my email.
>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
>

William Bug, M.S., M.Phil.                                         		 
email: wbug@ncmir.ucsd.edu
Ontological Engineer (Programmer Analyst III)		work: (610) 457-0443
Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN)
and
National Center for Microscopy & Imaging Research (NCMIR)
Dept. of Neuroscience, School of Medicine
University of California, San Diego
9500 Gilman Drive
La Jolla, CA 92093

Please note my email has recently changed