Re: DIG2.0 (from Protege OWL list)

Dear Aaron,

Your question is probably more at home at the public-owl-dev@w3.org 
mailinglist (cc-ed)

-Rinke

Aaron Steele wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>  
> It seems a few of us, myself included are having problems with datatype 
> properties, and from what I understand they're due to limitations not of 
> protege, or a particular reasoner but of DIG1.1 and could be solved by 
> DIG2.0 (from what I've read about it).
>  
> Does anybody know the status of DIG2.0, i.e. when it's likely to be 
> released or if pre-release versions are available anywhere?  I tried 
> emailing a developer of it but no reply yet.
>  
> Aaron
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> protege-owl mailing list
> protege-owl@lists.stanford.edu
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/protege-owl
> 
> Instructions for unsubscribing: http://protege.stanford.edu/doc/faq.html#01a.03