W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: IFP and datatype properties

From: Alex Tucker <alex@floop.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 16:53:47 +0000
Message-ID: <45F03F9B.2060603@floop.org.uk>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
CC: public-owl-dev@w3.org

> What i have done, for non-compound keys, is create a uri with the
> value embedded as a string, use and object property and make that
> inverse functional.
We've been following a similar pattern, essentially preferring
ObjectProperties over DatatypeProperties for the most part.  However,
Ian's assertion that the "tractability of reasoning ... depends on the
fact that they are typically *not* used in this way," worries me a
little, if, as users, we've all been expecting IFPs to cope.

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2007 22:54:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:14 UTC