W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2006

Re: perspectives on OWL v.next and RDF

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:58:56 -0600
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Cc: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>, public-owl-dev@w3.org
Message-Id: <1163602736.28647.177.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 12:13 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote:
> On 14/11/06, Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com> wrote:
> 
> > I consistently fail to understand the import of that kind of claim,
> > as it seems to suggest that the public Semantic Web is the most
> > important thing.
> 
> The (Semantic) Web is a public entity.

Oh? I don't think so. As I said to the XML 2005 crowd
and to several other audiences where I have used these
slides since then...

[[
Scaling 
      * yes, scalability to 10^9 nodes and up is important
      * but so is scalability down to families and scout troops
]]
 -- slide "Getting into the Web: downhill steps"
 http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/mash/slides#(5)

See also
 The Fractal nature of the Web
 Tim Berners-Lee 
 Date: 1998 
 Status: personal view only. Editing status: first draft.
 http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Fractal


>  It seems a straightforward
> distinction, by definition things that aren't connected to it aren't
> part of the Web.

Intranets are often connected to the Web with links that go one
way but not the other.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 14:59:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:53 GMT