W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-dev@w3.org > October to December 2006

perspectives on OWL v.next and RDF

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:56:57 -0600
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
Cc: public-owl-dev@w3.org
Message-Id: <1163447817.29678.45.camel@dirk>

Bijan,

Thanks for your recent item on the relationship between OWL 1.1
and RDF...

http://clarkparsia.com/weblog/2006/11/13/not-so-alternate-a-view-of-owl-11/

I it addresses many of the concerns I have that Jim and Ora expressed
http://www.mindswap.org/blog/2006/11/11/an-alternative-view-for-owl-11/
http://www.lassila.org/blog/archive/2006/11/more_on_rdf.html

Between the 3 of those posts, I feel the urgency to finish my own
has gone down to the point where I can collect my thoughts
on OWL 1.1 without rushing too much. I'm still thinking about how
to reconcile punning, in particular...

Oh... and I have been doing some relevant work...

  Using ACL2 with Semantic Web Data
  http://dig.csail.mit.edu/2006/Papers/owl-acl2/doc20

I hope to look at the axiomatic semantics Jim mentions
in that light.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 13 November 2006 19:57:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 09:32:53 GMT