- From: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 17:11:29 -0700 (PDT)
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Yes, that resolves the issue. Thank you. Regards, --Paul --- On Mon, 10/12/09, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> wrote: > From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk> > Subject: [LC response] To Paul Tyson > To: phtyson@sbcglobal.net > Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org > Date: Monday, October 12, 2009, 11:13 AM > Dear Paul, > > Thank you for your comment > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Oct/0000.html> > on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. > > You are quite correct that those should all be "refs". > Thanks for the catch. I've fixed the schema: > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php?title=OWL_XML_Schema&diff=25943&oldid=25667> > Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org> > (replying to this email should suffice). In your > acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are > satisfied with the working group's response to your > comment. > > Regards, > Bijan Parsia > on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group > >
Received on Tuesday, 13 October 2009 00:12:02 UTC