Susie Stephens wrote: > 1. Personally, I feel OWL2 is a wrap-up of different recent efforts in the > OWL community from different research forces, such as EL from Dresden, QL > and RL from Manchester/Oxford. Given the usage of OWL 1.0 is quite limited > in the industry compare to the usage of RDF, it may cost many extra efforts > and is very challenging to teach system developers to use new OWL2, in > particular, identifying different subsets of OWL2 for developers with > limited logic background. Personally, I feel the same. (see my other messages to the list for more technical comments by our group) Frank. ---- -- Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh Working on the Large Knowledge Collider http://www.LarKC.euReceived on Saturday, 24 January 2009 09:44:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 24 January 2009 09:44:56 GMT