W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-owl-comments@w3.org > February 2009

Re: [LC response] To Timothy Redmond

From: Timothy Redmond <tredmond@stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:10:52 -0800
Cc: public-owl-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <FB028956-32F0-4956-8DAC-AA86955138B2@stanford.edu>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>

Sorry Bijan -

I should have replied earlier.  I am quite satisfied with the response  
of the working group.

I wanted to thank you for your kind patience in the exchange.  I found  
it very interesting and educational.  And to thank the whole working  
group for an amazing effort.

Cheers,

-Timothy


On Feb 24, 2009, at 1:00 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> Dear Timothy,
>
> Thank you for your comment
>     <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/2009Jan/0008.html 
> >
> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts.
>
> Following our discussion, esp. considering your email:
>    <http://www.w3.org/mid/A84C23FA-2D01-416F-B198-CC6A9E5C2D06@stanford.edu 
> >
> and
>    <http://www.w3.org/mid/1234985444.5580.78.camel@smi-tredmond-li.stanford.edu 
> >
> the working group has decided to make no changes to our  
> specification. We agree that XML Catalogs needs advocacy in order  
> for it to become ubiquitous, but that is outside the scope of the  
> working group.
>
> Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl-comments@w3.org 
> > (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment  
> please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working  
> group's response to your comment.
>
> Regards,
> Bijan Parsia
> on behalf of the W3C OWL Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 24 February 2009 22:11:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 24 February 2009 22:11:32 GMT