W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2015

Re: annotating csv

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:11:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CABevsUEMuO4m+GOwgNBOF+uMCZebo8gXYd2R9v3w6Xu8_FjHhA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Cc: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
+1.

Jeni is on both 7111 and the CSV WG, so I'd be surprised if the WG came up
with something completely incompatible.  We discussed annotations with the
CSV WG at TPAC last year, and they're aware of Open Annotation and were
interested in adopting it for comments about ranges of cells and so forth.

Rob


On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:01 PM, David Wood <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
>
> Modulo whatever the CSV on the Web WG does, sure. It makes sense to me.
>
> The worst case scenario is that you might need to tweak the URI later, but
> at least you know that you will, one way or the other, have a URI to tweak.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
> --
> http://about.me/david_wood
>
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 2015, at 15:52, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > If I wanted to annotate a portion of a CSV using Open Annotation is RFC
> 7111 [1] an acceptable way to identify the target of the annotation?
> >
> > I guess some of this might still be in flux with the CSV on the Web
> working group [2] but I am curious if this might be a good way to proceed
> for a prototype.
> >
> > Thanks for any guidance/advice you can offer,
> >
> > //Ed
> >
> > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7111
> > [2] https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/9
>
>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Information Standards Advocate
Digital Library Systems and Services
Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 21:11:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 January 2015 21:11:38 UTC