- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:01:05 -0500
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Ed, Modulo whatever the CSV on the Web WG does, sure. It makes sense to me. The worst case scenario is that you might need to tweak the URI later, but at least you know that you will, one way or the other, have a URI to tweak. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood > On Jan 21, 2015, at 15:52, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > If I wanted to annotate a portion of a CSV using Open Annotation is RFC 7111 [1] an acceptable way to identify the target of the annotation? > > I guess some of this might still be in flux with the CSV on the Web working group [2] but I am curious if this might be a good way to proceed for a prototype. > > Thanks for any guidance/advice you can offer, > > //Ed > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7111 > [2] https://github.com/w3c/csvw/issues/9
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 2015 21:01:28 UTC