Re: invalid anchors in OA specification

Dear Stian, all,

> In my never-present spare time, I'm working on an alternative, but
> still similar way to do this kind of "spec style" rendering.
> http://owl.s11.no/view/ont/http://www.w3.org/ns/oa.rdf
> with a bit more control of the rendering and hyperlinks.

This is great. LODE is one of the many services that exist that can 
generate some human readable documentation of an OWL ontology / SKOS 
thesaurus. My preferences, however, tend to go for specgen (e.g. which 
is used to generate the FOAF doc and many other popular vocabularies 
documentation).

specgen is developed on Github: https://github.com/specgen/specgen (read 
also http://smiy.wordpress.com/2010/07/13/my-specgen-version-6/)

> For instance I am planning a /respec/ style that uses respec.js for a
> "W3C"-like rendering, e.g. MUST and SHOULD appear in colours. I am
> also thinking to do add support for the prov:component annotations as
> used in http://w3.org/ns/prov-o - for grouping related
> properties/classes in sections.  (
> http://owl.s11.no/view/ont/http://w3.org/ns/prov-o )
>
> I have also added Markdown support, which means you get this nice mix
> of being able to have HTML and/or Markdown in your rdfs:comment and
> get it rendered somewhat sensible. Except for the odd hyperlink, I did
> not find anything Markdown-like in the OA OWL now (like `code`,
> *emphasis* or > quote).

All this are great features and enhancements.
Question: why not building upon specgen to develop this recspec for OWL? 
I believe this was the original intention.
Best regards.

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/

Received on Sunday, 2 November 2014 19:42:15 UTC