- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 08:38:44 +0200
- To: <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Rob, You are right, well spotted! The rdf:nil should indeed be present to indicate that the list is "closed". Best, Antoine > I \think/ the following is meaningful and right about > http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/20130208/multiplicity.html#List > > 1. The turtle example doesn't specify that the list ends in rdf:nil > although the picture does. I think you need something like > rdf:rest [ rdf:first<selector2> ; > rdf:rest rdf:nil ] > as the end of<list1> > > 2. Well, the spec doesn't actually require or even suggest an oa:List > should be terminated by rdf:nil, but IMO it would be a good help for > consumers. Maybe those looking at the rdf ordering problem already > have discussed this issue. > > > -- > Robert A. Morris > > Emeritus Professor of Computer Science > UMASS-Boston > 100 Morrissey Blvd > Boston, MA 02125-3390 > > IT Staff > Filtered Push Project > Harvard University Herbaria > Harvard University > > email: morris.bob@gmail.com > web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/ > web: http://wiki.filteredpush.org > http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram > === > The content of this communication is made entirely on my > own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express > official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or > Harvard University. >
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2013 07:31:52 UTC