W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > August 2012

Re: status of rdf schemas

From: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:46:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPRnXt=F4uHOBrogG=Bqt0PCz-r0q91b=tXKRU1h5wuEfKVhHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
I've made my suggested changes to the two schemas, to include the owl
typing of classes and properties.

See https://github.com/stain/oa/

I've used vim rather than Protege so that the diff would not be too bad.

The additional OWL statements should not affect RDFS interpretations,
I've kept both rdf:Property and say owl:ObjectProperty.

I've also typed the ranges for the data type properties that are
xsd:dateTimeStamp and xsd:nonNegativeInteger. (I did not type
oax:prefix and oax:exact - as I don't know if you want to keep those
as xsd:string or rdf:PlainLiteral.

from oa:SpecificResource I removed the superclass rdfs:Resource as
anything in RDF is an rdfs:Resource.

I've not modified oa:equivalent now.

Unless anyone protests, then Robert or someone could put these up on
openannotation.org/spec/*/. You would need to change the timestamps of
owl:versionInfo, and add a link to these from the HTMLs, as Bob hinted

On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
> As far as I know they're up to date for the current draft.  They don't
> reflect the proposed changes for Style.  Also Stian has been
> volunteered to work on an OWL version to clarify the details that
> aren't expressable in plain RDFS.
> After the September meeting (TBA very soon) we'll talk to the W3C
> administration folk to get revised documents put up at the correct
> namespace URI.
> Please let us know if there are any issues that you run into with the mapping :)
> Hope that helps!
> Rob
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could we have some insight into the status of
>> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/core-schema.xml
>> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/extension-schema.xml
>> Are they deemed current to http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>> (resp. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/)?.  I need to try
>> to recode our usecase examples from AO to OA.
>> Also, it would be really nice to be able to find these easily from the
>> spec main pates.
>> Thanks
>> Bob
>> --
>> Robert A. Morris
>> Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science
>> UMASS-Boston
>> 100 Morrissey Blvd
>> Boston, MA 02125-3390
>> IT Staff
>> Filtered Push Project
>> Harvard University Herbaria
>> Harvard University
>> email: morris.bob@gmail.com
>> web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/
>> web: http://etaxonomy.org/mw/FilteredPush
>> http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
>> ===
>> The content of this communication is made entirely on my
>> own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express
>> official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or
>> Harvard University.

Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 14:47:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:01 UTC