W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > August 2012

Re: status of rdf schemas

From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 12:00:17 -0600
Message-ID: <CABevsUEpOja279kNx9-cdq2dMRqGjf734SMW+REmQiTChWc3Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
Cc: Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Should the owl:versionInfo be the current timestamp or the timestamp
of the spec release?

Also, currently they look like core/20120509, but core is in the
Ontology's namespace. Should it just be the timestamp?

Many thanks for your work on this Stian!

Rob

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
<soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> I've made my suggested changes to the two schemas, to include the owl
> typing of classes and properties.
>
> See https://github.com/stain/oa/
>
> I've used vim rather than Protege so that the diff would not be too bad.
>
>
> The additional OWL statements should not affect RDFS interpretations,
> I've kept both rdf:Property and say owl:ObjectProperty.
>
>
> I've also typed the ranges for the data type properties that are
> xsd:dateTimeStamp and xsd:nonNegativeInteger. (I did not type
> oax:prefix and oax:exact - as I don't know if you want to keep those
> as xsd:string or rdf:PlainLiteral.
>
> from oa:SpecificResource I removed the superclass rdfs:Resource as
> anything in RDF is an rdfs:Resource.
>
> I've not modified oa:equivalent now.
>
>
>
> Unless anyone protests, then Robert or someone could put these up on
> openannotation.org/spec/*/. You would need to change the timestamps of
> owl:versionInfo, and add a link to these from the HTMLs, as Bob hinted
> at.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As far as I know they're up to date for the current draft.  They don't
>> reflect the proposed changes for Style.  Also Stian has been
>> volunteered to work on an OWL version to clarify the details that
>> aren't expressable in plain RDFS.
>>
>> After the September meeting (TBA very soon) we'll talk to the W3C
>> administration folk to get revised documents put up at the correct
>> namespace URI.
>>
>> Please let us know if there are any issues that you run into with the mapping :)
>>
>> Hope that helps!
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Bob Morris <morris.bob@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could we have some insight into the status of
>>>
>>> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/core-schema.xml
>>> http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/extension-schema.xml
>>>
>>> Are they deemed current to http://www.openannotation.org/spec/core/
>>> (resp. http://www.openannotation.org/spec/extension/)?.  I need to try
>>> to recode our usecase examples from AO to OA.
>>>
>>> Also, it would be really nice to be able to find these easily from the
>>> spec main pates.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Bob
>>> --
>>> Robert A. Morris
>>>
>>> Emeritus Professor  of Computer Science
>>> UMASS-Boston
>>> 100 Morrissey Blvd
>>> Boston, MA 02125-3390
>>>
>>> IT Staff
>>> Filtered Push Project
>>> Harvard University Herbaria
>>> Harvard University
>>>
>>> email: morris.bob@gmail.com
>>> web: http://efg.cs.umb.edu/
>>> web: http://etaxonomy.org/mw/FilteredPush
>>> http://www.cs.umb.edu/~ram
>>> ===
>>> The content of this communication is made entirely on my
>>> own behalf and in no way should be deemed to express
>>> official positions of The University of Massachusetts at Boston or
>>> Harvard University.
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2012 18:00:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 August 2012 18:00:47 GMT