- From: Alexandre Rademaker <arademaker@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 15:26:02 -0300
- To: John McCrae <john@mccr.ae>
- Cc: Armando Stellato <stellato@uniroma2.it>, "public-ontolex@w3.org" <public-ontolex@w3.org>
Even PWN has such gaps. Many synset were created only to have a clear hierarchy. But PWN used MWEs in such cases. Alexandre Sent from my iPhone > On 20 Apr 2017, at 07:56, John McCrae <john@mccr.ae> wrote: > > As such, it should be noted that for many wordnets created for languages other than English, there are gaps where the English synset is not lexicalized in the target language but they still exist in the hierarchy, hence they are unlexicalized lexical concepts, so the semasialogical/onomasiological distinction does not quite fit in all cases.
Received on Thursday, 20 April 2017 18:26:38 UTC