Re: specification

Hi Lupe,

  thanks for your comments, i have added them to the discussion page 
here: 
http://www.w3.org/community/ontolex/wiki/Talk:Final_Model_Specification

We will briefly discuss them today at the telco.

Regards,

Philipp.

Am 10.01.14 05:17, schrieb GUADALUPE AGUADO DE CEA:
> "A Lexical Entry can be realized in different grammatical realizations 
> depending on the requirements of the linguistic context it appears in. 
> These different grammatical realizations are represented as different 
> Forms of the lexical entry in the core. A Form is defined as: "a 
> single inflected unit of a lexical entry with a single pronunciation, 
> although potentially many orthographies."
>
> 1 When defining a form, Why do we mention "with a single 
> pronunciation"? I think for our purposes it is not that relevant 
> whether we pronounce "privacy" the American or British way. We do not 
> have to represent phonetics. Or maybe I've lost something in the 
> previous calls???
>
> 2. When defining ea lexical entry, Is it necessary to say "depending 
> on the requirements of the linguistic context?  I'd say that it is 
> clear without the phrase and maybe it adds a bit of "noise" . It seems 
> to add no features really to the proper definition.


-- 

Prof. Dr. Philipp Cimiano

Phone: +49 521 106 12249
Fax: +49 521 106 12412
Mail: cimiano@cit-ec.uni-bielefeld.de

Forschungsbau Intelligente Systeme (FBIIS)
Raum 2.307
Universität Bielefeld
Inspiration 1
33619 Bielefeld

Received on Friday, 10 January 2014 05:55:33 UTC