- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:17:51 +0100
- To: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>, ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
Thanks Renato, Next step is to hear from LDP. All being well I can then book a table and offer services as waiter and sommelier some time soon. Arnaud? Phil. On 11/09/2014 03:26, Renato Iannella wrote: > > On 8 Sep 2014, at 19:24, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > >> BUT... both groups are essentially talking about access control one way or another. Both communities are asking for a new WG to take this forward. So my question is pretty basic: could you work together? Would the tensions between the two communities be such that a combined solution would be a dog's dinner (i.e. very bad) or could it be that the combined force of the two communities means there's a greater chance of success for both? > > Hi Phil/All... > > We have designed the ODRL Core Model as a generic "policy model" - so it could be used for use cases like CRUD Access Control expressions for the Linked Data Platform. We would have to look a bit into some of the details, but that would be part of the normal WG development process. > > So, from our POV, the answer to your "wedding proposal" is "yes, but lets date first". > > What would be the next steps? > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 > > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 06:18:19 UTC