- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:26:39 +1000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, ODRL Community Group <public-odrl@w3.org>, public-ldp-wg@w3.org
On 8 Sep 2014, at 19:24, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > BUT... both groups are essentially talking about access control one way or another. Both communities are asking for a new WG to take this forward. So my question is pretty basic: could you work together? Would the tensions between the two communities be such that a combined solution would be a dog's dinner (i.e. very bad) or could it be that the combined force of the two communities means there's a greater chance of success for both? Hi Phil/All... We have designed the ODRL Core Model as a generic "policy model" - so it could be used for use cases like CRUD Access Control expressions for the Linked Data Platform. We would have to look a bit into some of the details, but that would be part of the normal WG development process. So, from our POV, the answer to your "wedding proposal" is "yes, but lets date first". What would be the next steps? Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2014 02:27:16 UTC