- From: Renato Iannella <ri@semanticidentity.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:13:09 +1000
- To: "ODRL Community Group (Contrib)" <public-odrl-contrib@w3.org>
On 7 Aug 2014, at 03:05, Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > However, the rationale was that for the cases where the Set is a simple license grant, then using a property which is already widely used for exactly that purpose made more sense than inventing a new one for the purpose. There wasn’t an odrl:policy proposal because as Renato notes, the ODRL model’s approach was to attach the asset to the policy, not the other way around — and that makes sense if you think about it; if it’s *not* a simple license grant, then it’s much more likely that it would be specific to the asset. It might be useful however to have an odrl:policy property (as this is broader than dct:license) and could also be mapped to the W3C Media Ontology's policy property [1]. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#policy-property-examples
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 01:13:42 UTC