Re: Basic processes

On Monday, November 19, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:

> 
> 
> I'd like to make a suggestion to the group... I agree with the points above as all being fine goals - but the scope is really huge and I think that the prollyfill space is big enough from a work standpoint all on its own for now without even wading into polyfills or shims - I also think (personally) that it is the most important aspect and currently totally unfilled.... 
> 
> How do you all feel about focusing there - at least for starters? 

WFM - and I agree that the scope is quite large. 

So, that leaves (slightly more refined):

1. Research current prollyfill strategies.
2. Come up with a (potentially) new way to do prollyfills as informed on 1.
  

-- 
Marcos Caceres

Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 17:01:42 UTC