W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mw4d@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Additional feedback on the roadmap doc

From: Renjish Kumar <renjish.kumar@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 11:23:24 +0530
Message-ID: <ad721fa60909232253o44e02c1dj530c993213d1855f@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org>
Cc: public-mw4d@w3.org
Hello Stephane, all,
   Sorry for mixing both comments and corrections in the same doc...Went
with the flow... Will separately list them along with my final review before
the next call.....

Meanwhile, here is a positive news regarding localization from India.....


Considering the fact that 2 of the local languages (Hindi & Bengali) feature
in the top ten spoken languages, globally (while completely missing out in a
similar list for languages on Internet) I think this is a major step.

It's also worth mentioning that a government agency (http://www.ildc.in/)
came up with fonts for the Indian languages, thereby emphasizing on the role
that governments can play in developing technologies (and not being mere
policy makers) to support social development using ICT.

By the way, how do we define a lesser-known language? Can we get a reference
to this? Is the emphasis on lesser-known or less-spoken? I think these are
not the same because lesser-known begs the question, less known to whom? The
developer, the end-user or people from a particular geography? It's


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Stephane Boyera <boyera@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Renjish,
> thanks for the extensive review.
> I would like to propose that you don't mix in the document the proof
> reading and the comments, as it is very hard to extract the comments.
> The proof-reading work is great and having it in the document is helpful.
> The comments are more easily discussed outside the document. So please in
> the future, extract them.
> For now, i tried to summarize them below (merging those from this version,
> from the one coming from the previous version:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-mw4d/2009Aug/0063.html ):
> 1- Change in structure:
> you are proposing to move up the executive summary as the first section,
> and the scope as the 5th section
> 2- adding a definition section (probably as the second section of the doc
> after the intro ?)
> 3-restructuring the audience as put in the latest document you sent
> did i miss any major comments ?
> Thanks
> Stephane
> Renjish Kumar a écrit :
> Hello,
>>   Pls. refer the attached doc for additional comments and corrections on
>> the Aug 28 version of the roadmap doc... I am at the 6th section now... So,
>> will be back soon with the final comments soon....  Regards
>> Renjish
> --
> Stephane Boyera         stephane@w3.org
> W3C                             +33 (0) 5 61 86 13 08
> BP 93                           fax: +33 (0) 4 92 38 78 22
> F-06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex,
> France
Received on Thursday, 24 September 2009 05:54:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:07:10 UTC