W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > January 2013

Re: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:41:07 +0100
Message-ID: <51079933.3040801@w3.org>
To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
CC: Tadej Štajner <tadej.stajner@ijs.si>, Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, Artūrs Vasiļevskis <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>
Thanks, Phil. Tadej, was the intention of its:tanRefs at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Jan/0212.html
to have several pointers, e.g. allow for
its:tanRefs="tan1 tan2 tan3"
or just one, that is only "tan1"?

Best,

Felx


Am 29.01.13 10:34, schrieb Phil Ritchie:
> All
>
> @Felix: "But while doing that a question on the LQI/Provenance
> implementers: is it a feature that you point to just one external standoff
> unit, or an oversight, and it could it be several ones?"
>
> My current thinking is that stand-off stores many annotations for one
> segment. This is because if several segments are linked to one stand-off
> block, then if one of those segments needs to have another unique issue
> registered against it, you have to copy the stand-off, add the unique
> annotation and change the reference id's so that the link is between the
> segment with the additional annotation and the copied stand-off. Complex.
>
> Another argument for pointing to a single stand-off is that although the
> "classification" attributes of the markup might be identical (e.g.
> loc-quality-issue-type="style" loc-quality-issue-severity="75") each may
> have a different loc-quality-issue-comment to highlight the specific nature
> of the error.
>
> Hmm. The benefit of the id being on the segment/element and the idRefs
> being on the stand-off really comes into its own if you want to have
> multiple annotations across many data categories for the same
> segment/element.
>
> <span id="loaded">blah</span>
>
> <its:prov ref="loaded"...
> <its:locQualityIssues ref="loaded"...
> <its:textAnalysis ref="loaded"
> (on the train, I know this is not valid markup.)
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> On 28 Jan 2013, at 19:57, "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> But while doing that a question on the LQI/Provenance implementers: is it
> a feature that you point to just one external standoff unit, or an
> oversight, and it could it be several ones?
>
>
> ************************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
> the sender immediately by e-mail.
>
> www.vistatec.com
> ************************************************************
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 09:41:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:08:26 UTC