W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > January 2013

RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup

From: Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:42:21 +0200
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, 'Felix Sasaki' <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>, Artūrs Vasiļevskis <arturs.vasilevskis@Tilde.lv>
Message-ID: <AC6FD4BB9BB02540AC7322091A6C3B5472B0F00FCF@postal.Tilde.lv>
Hi Felix, all,

I also do not have anything against leaving everything as is.
I however (as I made clear in my previous e-mail) don't think that the stand-off markup is a nice solution.

Best regards,
Mārcis ;o)

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 5:31 PM
To: 'Felix Sasaki'; Mārcis Pinnis
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org; Artūrs Vasiļevskis
Subject: RE: issue-68 from an annotation representation point of view, with potential implications for annotatorsRef and standoff markup

Hi Felix, all,

> Just a judgment from my side: I think at the moment we don't have 
> consensus for
>
> - leaving everything as is (Dave's proposal)

I don't have anything against leaving things as is.
There is nothing really broken.

It's just that having both data categories fused would be a bit nicer. But overall if there is no time to make that work, we can indeed just leave it as it is.

cheers,
-yves


Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 15:42:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:08:26 UTC