W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [All] moving best practices and other evolving, non-normative material to ITS - IG

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:20:14 +0100
Message-ID: <512DCFCE.706@w3.org>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Sorry, Jirka, I wasn't clear in my proposal, see below.

Am 27.02.13 10:16, schrieb Jirka Kosek:
> On 27.2.2013 9:25, Felix Sasaki wrote:
>
>> I would propose "best practice" topics to the ITS IG at the end of March
>> or early April. That will make it much easier to accomodate feedback
>> from outside. If we start trying to build a community including people
>> from outside the working group at the end of the year, my forecast is
>> that nobody will show up.
>>
>> Thoughts?
> Personally I don't like wiki for such content. It's hard to edit,
> unsuitable for longer documents and it's very hard to keep it
> editorially consistent.

Agree - I wouldn't say that we should put all editing material into 
wikis. My main point was that we should start using the open wiki for 
gathering input from outside. The actual editing then should be in XML 
or HTML, the latter relying on respec, as you suggest. The workaround we 
currently have for publishing
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Use_cases_-_high_level_summary
is a this time only approach.

Best,

Felix

>
> I would go with WG Note. If TEI or xmlspec markup is too complex to
> author for potential contributors we can edit directly in HTML and use
> ReSpec: https://github.com/darobin/respec
>
> 				Jirka
>
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 09:20:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:08 UTC