W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > November 2012

Provenance examples (Re: [Minutes] editing call 2012-11-27 ...)

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:01:44 +0100
Message-ID: <50B5B6D8.8080101@w3.org>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
Hi Yves, all,

in your description below you mention revProvRef, and there are there is 
a refProvRef attribute in
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-provenance-local-1
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-provenance-html5-local-2
and the ref-prov-ref counterpart for HTML5 in
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#EX-provenance-html5-local-1

However, the attribute definition
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/drafts/its20/its20.html#provenance-local
just has "provRef". There is no "revision" specific version of this 
attribute. I think the rationale is that "provRef" (or prov-ref) point 
to external provenance descriptions which can be anything: describing 
intital translation, revision, ...

Provenance masters, can you clarify? We then would need to change the 
examples I think.

Best,

Felix

Am 27.11.12 19:32, schrieb Yves Savourel:
> Hi Felix, Dave, all,
>
>> Yves will make an update to the provenance section, probably also taking
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2012Nov/0218.html
>> into account, and send it to the list.
> All the pointers (but one) have been removed from Provenance and the examples have been updated.
>
> I've noted a few things:
>
> -- Several of the example had things like this: provRef="http://www.examplelsp.com/excontent987/legal/prov/e6354 http://www.vistatec.com/job-12-7-15-X31/reviewed/prov/re8573469". i.e. provRef or refProvRef with several IRIs, I assume this was copy/paste error or, in other cases, it needed to be split into provRef and revProvRef.
>
> -- We had a few occurrences of 'ref' attributes, I assumed that was meant to be provRef (or revProvRef depending on the cases).
>
> Please make sure to review the examples.
>
> Hopefully once Jirka is done with the schema we can have the examples automatically validated on build.
>
> cheers,
> -yves
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 07:02:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 9 June 2013 00:25:03 UTC