W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org > November 2012

Atb.: Atb.: [ACTION-256]: Compile and circulate itsTool examples togehter with proposal text

From: Mārcis Pinnis <marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:02:21 +0200
To: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AC6FD4BB9BB02540AC7322091A6C3B5472AFE0C618@postal.Tilde.lv>
Hi Dave,

I have attached the questions and comments (from the same document as I presented in the meeting) in the attachment.
The first page can be skipped as that pictures only the terminology use case and how terminology should be extracted...

Best regards,
Mārcis ;o)

No: Dave Lewis [dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie]
Nosūtīts: pirmdiena, 2012. gada 5. novembrī 18:00
Kam: Mārcis Pinnis
Tēma: Re: Atb.: [ACTION-256]: Compile and circulate itsTool examples togehter  with  proposal text

Hi marcis,
At the meeting on friday, you had an interesting list of topics that you
projected. Could you send them to the list, if you haven't already, so
we can address them there.


On 01/11/2012 10:02, Mārcis Pinnis wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> We had a short discussion with Dave about the different confidence scores and we came up to an understanding that the current version might have issues reflecting various kinds of confidences.
> For instance, if we have Named Entity Recognition, Term annotation, then also translation and possible other processes that might affect quality, then:
> 1) The text analysis confidence does not allow distinguishing between multiple confidences for one tagged element (for instance, 0.1 - termAnnotator1; 0.5 termAnnotator2; 0.7 - namedEntityRecogniser1, etc.)
> 2) Having different confidence namings will make the standard quite heavy (do we really know all the types of confidences that people might like to add/use? Maybe we should not restrict to the ones specified?)
> One solution that I was thinking could be having something like agentConfidence that may contain a complex structure ("0.1|0.5|0.7|etc.") and then have somewhere specified how to understand this sequence.
> Any thoughts? Ideas?
> Best regards,
> Mārcis ;o)
> ________________________________________
> No: Dave Lewis [dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie]
> Nosūtīts: ceturtdiena, 2012. gada 1. novembrī 10:16
> Kam: public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> Tēma: [ACTION-256]: Compile and circulate itsTool examples togehter with  proposal text
> Hi,
> The attached file contains a revision to Yves its-tools proposal. I have
> also added revised text for mt confidence score and text analysis
> annotation revised . Finally, I have also added at the end the examples
> from these data categories, showing how the engine identification
> information (which I've now removed from the data category), can be
> repalced using the its-tools element.
> There are comments that need to be addressed in the document. We can go
> through these quickly if we wish in the meeting.
> cheers,
> Dave

Received on Monday, 5 November 2012 16:05:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:08:24 UTC