W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org > December 2012

RE: HTML global rules embedded case

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:16:52 -0700
To: "'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'" <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Message-ID: <assp.07016f7132.assp.0701963936.002f01cddeac$13417310$39c45930$@com>
Hi Pablo, all,

> 1) The GLOBAL definition says:
> A provenanceRecordsRefPointer attribute that contains a relative 
> selector pointing to a node containing a list of provenance records.
> The global rule does not apply to HTML as local markup is provided 
> for direct annotation in HTML.
>
> What does this last sentence exactly mean? That in HTML embedded rules 
> for this data category are not permitted? 
> I think I don't understand it, whereas in the LQI definition says 
> "The attribute locQualityIssuesRefPointer does not apply to HTML as 
> local markup is provided for direct annotation in HTML" in provenance 
> says "the global rule...", I think it would be clearer or at least 
> less confusing if it was "The attribute provenanceRecordsRefPointer does 
> not apply to HTML as local markup is provided for direct annotation 
> in HTML" but I'm not exactly sure if it's the same case.

I think the confusion comes from the fact that provenanceRecordsRefPointer is the only global information for provRule. So saying that the attribute does not apply to HTML is equivalent to say that the global rule does not apply to HTML.

Maybe the sentence could be: "The attribute provenanceRecordsRefPointer does not apply to HTML as local markup is provided for direct annotation in HTML. Because that information is the only one in the provRule element, the global rule does not apply to HTML." (or something like that) would clarify things?

cheers,
-yves
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:18:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 December 2012 12:18:43 GMT