W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org > December 2012

RE: Output for locqualityissue and locqualityrating

From: Pablo Nieto Caride <pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 19:19:29 +0100
To: "'Yves Savourel'" <ysavourel@enlaso.com>, "'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'" <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Message-ID: <036501cdda27$8f248f50$ad6dadf0$@linguaserve.com>
Thank you Yves, I also agree.





If all LQI implementers agree with Leroy’s email here (I do):



then I can regenerate the LQI outputs with locQualityissueEnabled on all LQI nodes.

I have the whole day in front of me, unlike you :)




From: Leroy Finn [mailto:finnle@tcd.ie] 
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2012 10:09 AM
To: Phil Ritchie
Cc: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Re: Output for locqualityissue and locqualityrating


Also on those files with errors we are in the process of updating them but this issue is holding us back in updating them (this point was raised by Yves):


I saw that you updated locqualityissue3xmloutput.txt
Thanks for that.
Could we decide about when to represent locQualityIssueEnabled soon?
See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0069.html
- a) always
- b) only when the value is different from the default
Currently we output it when locQualityIssueEnabled is defined. But not all implementations can do this as it has a default value, so when a decorated node has a 'yes' it can be either from the default or from a declaration.
I think we have been outputting defaults in other data categories, so a) is probably the logical way to go. Note that either a) or b) means changing a few output files.


Have a nice weekend,



On 14 December 2012 16:58, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:

Hey Phil,


The its:param files are correct i checked them and so has Yves. There are errors in lqi 3 and 4 xml and html 1 which will be corrected soon. I didn't fix them today as I was busy with domain, target pointer and ruby. Also in the attachment you sent LQI outputs for both LQI and LQR. When you can could be please forward on the LQR results.





On 14 December 2012 16:15, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> wrote:


Attached all of our output for xml/html for locqualityissue/rating using files from github as of yesterday evening. 

The only differences are for parameterized rules and where I believe there are some bugs in the test suite output. 


This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail.



Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 18:20:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:03 UTC