W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org > December 2012

Re: Output for locqualityissue and locqualityrating

From: Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:08:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMYWBwtZvrY3VGCU5Fcy9dJZeTFedr3oM4AiBObxvOf9xy=aUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
Cc: Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Also on those files with errors we are in the process of updating them but
this issue is holding us back in updating them (this point was raised by

I saw that you updated locqualityissue3xmloutput.txt
> https://github.com/finnle/ITS-2.0-Testsuite/commit/f0d00c75f54fce96653ed7b00f49890e7c46ef16
> Thanks for that.
> Could we decide about when to represent locQualityIssueEnabled soon?
> See:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0069.html
> - a) always
> - b) only when the value is different from the default
> Currently we output it when locQualityIssueEnabled is defined. But not all
> implementations can do this as it has a default value, so when a decorated
> node has a 'yes' it can be either from the default or from a declaration.
> I think we have been outputting defaults in other data categories, so a)
> is probably the logical way to go. Note that either a) or b) means changing
> a few output files.
> cheers,
> -yves

Have a nice weekend,

On 14 December 2012 16:58, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:

> Hey Phil,
> The its:param files are correct i checked them and so has Yves. There are
> errors in lqi 3 and 4 xml and html 1 which will be corrected soon. I didn't
> fix them today as I was busy with domain, target pointer and ruby. Also in
> the attachment you sent LQI outputs for both LQI and LQR. When you can
> could be please forward on the LQR results.
> Thanks,
> Leroy
> On 14 December 2012 16:15, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> wrote:
>> Guys
>> Attached all of our output for xml/html for locqualityissue/rating using
>> files from github as of yesterday evening.
>> The only differences are for parameterized rules and where I believe
>> there are some bugs in the test suite output.
>> Phil.
>> ************************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>> the sender immediately by e-mail.
>> www.vistatec.com
>> ************************************************************
Received on Friday, 14 December 2012 17:09:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:03 UTC