W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org > December 2012

Re: locqualityissuexml

From: Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 17:25:17 +0000
Message-ID: <CAMYWBwvcvOBWhN=jwQi7VK_jnTmzdZBzYPKrfDrhh5DxzFjcCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie>
Cc: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, Dominic Jones <Dominic.Jones@cs.tcd.ie>, Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Hey Phil,

I have actually noted a note here on  xml 3 and 4 and html 1 for LQI Yves
mailed about it earlier to the list. I will look into resolving those
tomorrow all other LQI files and outputs are correct.

Leroy


On 13 December 2012 17:17, Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> wrote:

> Well spotted Phil that seems to be an old output file I will correct that
> now.
>
> Thanks,
> Leroy
>
>
> On 13 December 2012 17:10, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> wrote:
>
>> Leroy
>>
>> locqualityissue3xmloutput.txt seems to have output from another source
>> file in it? locQualityIssuesRef="#1234"?
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:        Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie>
>> To:        Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>,
>> Cc:        Dominic Jones <Dominic.Jones@cs.tcd.ie>, Multilingual Web
>> LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>, Phil Ritchie <
>> philr@vistatec.ie>
>> Date:        13/12/2012 14:15
>> Subject:        Re: locqualityissuexml
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey Phil,
>>
>> We have recently updated the input files to reflect the changes in the
>> draft so you will have to re run the output also we have added in tests for
>> standoff markup as well. The only major thing that will cause problem for
>> your parser is the standoff markup. The rest of the files should output
>> fine we had to do one or two corrections in relation to using "spelling"
>> instead of "misspelling" for its:locQualityIssueType. So once that is re
>> ran you should be fine for the commitment on Monday.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Leroy
>>
>>
>> On 13 December 2012 13:18, Dave Lewis <*dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie*<dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>>
>> wrote:
>> i'm probably behind the curve here, but do do we have something in place
>> where we post these results up and somehow get them checked and formally
>> 'passed'
>>
>> cheers,
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> *Subject: *
>> locqualityissuexml
>> *Resent-Date: *
>> Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:55 +0000
>> *Resent-From: *
>> *public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org*<public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
>> *Date: *
>> Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:01 +0000
>> *From: *
>> Phil Ritchie *<philr@vistatec.ie>* <philr@vistatec.ie>
>> *To: *
>> *public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org*<public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
>>
>>
>> Leroy
>>
>> Attached is our output for all xml locqualityissue tests except those
>> that use its:param. We're working on the html.
>>
>>
>>
>> Phil.
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>> the sender immediately by e-mail.
>>
>> *www.vistatec.com* <http://www.vistatec.com/>
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ************************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
>> the sender immediately by e-mail.
>>
>> www.vistatec.com
>> ************************************************************
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:25:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:25:45 GMT