W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org > December 2012

RE: locqualityissuexml

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:21:42 -0700
To: "'Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public'" <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>
Message-ID: <assp.0694b930d7.assp.06945943fc.000c01cdd956$51a44f70$f4ecee50$@com>
Hi Phil,

 

Yes, there was an extra locQualityIssuesRef in the source that should not have been there.

I’ve attached the output.

 

BUT: we need to decide what to do with locQualityIssueEnabled.

See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-tests/2012Dec/0069.html

 

There are the ‘1html’, and ‘4xml’ files that have their output that needs updating.

 

-yves

 

 

From: Phil Ritchie [mailto:philr@vistatec.ie] 
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:11 AM
To: Leroy Finn
Cc: Dave Lewis; Dominic Jones; Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public
Subject: Re: locqualityissuexml

 

Leroy 

locqualityissue3xmloutput.txt seems to have output from another source file in it? locQualityIssuesRef="#1234"? 

Phil.





From:        Leroy Finn <finnle@tcd.ie> 
To:        Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, 
Cc:        Dominic Jones <Dominic.Jones@cs.tcd.ie>, Multilingual Web LT-TESTS Public <public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org>, Phil Ritchie <philr@vistatec.ie> 
Date:        13/12/2012 14:15 
Subject:        Re: locqualityissuexml 

  _____  




Hey Phil, 

We have recently updated the input files to reflect the changes in the draft so you will have to re run the output also we have added in tests for standoff markup as well. The only major thing that will cause problem for your parser is the standoff markup. The rest of the files should output fine we had to do one or two corrections in relation to using "spelling" instead of "misspelling" for its:locQualityIssueType. So once that is re ran you should be fine for the commitment on Monday.   

Thanks, 
Leroy 


On 13 December 2012 13:18, Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: 
i'm probably behind the curve here, but do do we have something in place where we post these results up and somehow get them checked and formally 'passed'

cheers,
Dave



-------- Original Message -------- 


Subject: 

locqualityissuexml 


Resent-Date: 

Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:55 +0000 


Resent-From: 

public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org 


Date: 

Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:50:01 +0000 


From: 

Phil Ritchie  <mailto:philr@vistatec.ie> <philr@vistatec.ie> 


To: 

public-multilingualweb-lt-tests@w3.org




Leroy 

Attached is our output for all xml locqualityissue tests except those that use its:param. We're working on the html. 



Phil.


************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail. 

www.vistatec.com <http://www.vistatec.com/> 
************************************************************ 






************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the sender immediately by e-mail.

www.vistatec.com
************************************************************




Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:22:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 13 December 2012 17:22:15 GMT