W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418]

From: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 23:48:41 +0000
Message-ID: <510EF759.5050906@cs.tcd.ie>
To: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
CC: slata@mit.gov.in, schandra@deity.gov.in
Hi Somnath,
I wanted to follow up on this comment also. Do you have any comments on 
our response, was it satisfactory? If we hear from you to the contrary 
we will assume you are satisfied and aim to close ISSUE-109 on the 11th 
February.

Kind Regards,
Dave

On 28/01/2013 00:46, Dave Lewis wrote:
> Hi Somnath,
> I wanted to update you of the status of ISSUE-109, related to 
> disambiguation.
>
> We discussed this at the WG face to face meeting last week, see:
> http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item37.
>
> The consensus was that hierarchical annotation for disambiguation was 
> difficult to achieve technically. As you point out, ITS override rule 
> mean that any hierarchical annotation has to be supported explicitly 
> with special attributes. However, doing this in a generic way is 
> difficult as we may also need to support multiple different 
> annotations of the same text, and therefore map sub-annotations to 
> specific parent ones.
>
> You may have seen that there has been extensive discussion on 
> potentially merging the terminology and disambiguation data categories:
> http://www.w3.org/2013/01/24-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item03
> and
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/68
>
> At the meeting we asked the experts involved is considering technical 
> solutions to this to also address your hierarchical annotation 
> requirement, but this yielded no usable technical solution.
>
> We therefore propose to reject this suggested change.
>
> We would however point out  that the external NIF encoding (see 
> http://nlp2rdf.org/) would be better suited to capturing such 
> hierarchical annotations. We would welcome you input therefore in 
> formulating best practice for the use of ITS with external NIF models.
>
> Please let us know if you are satisfied with this response.
>
> I look forward to hearing from you.
> Regards,
> Dave Lewis
>
>
> On 21/01/2013 15:02, Dave Lewis wrote:
>> Hi,
>> To speed the resolution of the different issues in your original post 
>> I'll restricted ISSUE-84 to comments about the translate data 
>> category and raised two new issues:
>> ISSUE-108: locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages
>> ISSUE-109: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] 
>> languages
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> On 18/01/2013 12:46, Dr. David Filip wrote:
>>> Hi all, this comment is now associated with Issue-84
>>> Rgds
>>> dF
>>>
>>> Dr. David Filip
>>> =======================
>>> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS
>>> University of Limerick, Ireland
>>> telephone: +353-6120-2781
>>> *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158*
>>> facsimile: +353-6120-2734
>>> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie <mailto:david.filip@ul.ie>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org 
>>> <mailto:fsasaki@w3.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Forwarded on behalf of Somnath Chandra (by permission), with CC
>>>     to Somnath and Svaran Lata.The comments are not yet in tracker.
>>>     See also new comments (also not in tracker yet) on the
>>>     www-international list at
>>>     http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0065.html
>>>
>>>     If you have input for replying to the comments, please provide
>>>     it on our comments list (but feel free to put others in CC to
>>>     speed up the process).
>>>
>>>     Best,
>>>
>>>     Felix
>>>
>>>
>>>     -------- Original-Nachricht --------
>>>     Betreff: 	Fwd: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages
>>>     Datum: 	Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:46:52 +0530
>>>     Von: 	Somnath Chandra <schandra@deity.gov.in>
>>>     <mailto:schandra@deity.gov.in>
>>>     An: 	Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> <mailto:fsasaki@w3.org>
>>>     Kopie (CC): 	slata <slata@mit.gov.in> <mailto:slata@mit.gov.in>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     Dear Dr. Felix Sasaki,
>>>     W3C India has compiled the Indic Languages requirements for ITS
>>>     2.0. Kindly find enclosed the draft document developed for the
>>>     purpose.
>>>     Submitted for kind perusal. Please feel free to contact me for
>>>     any further clarifications / discussions.
>>>     With best regards,
>>>     Somnath , W3C India
>>>     Dr. Somnath Chandra
>>>     Joint Director and Dy. Country Manager , W3C India
>>>     Dept. of Electronics & Information Technology
>>>     Ministry of Communications & Information Technology
>>>     Govt. of India
>>>     Tel:+91-11-24364744,24301811
>>>     Fax: +91-11-24363099 <tel:%2B91-11-24363099>
>>>     e-mail :schandra@mit.gov.in <mailto:schandra@mit.gov.in>
>>>     -------- Original Message --------
>>>     From: *Prashant Verma *<vermaprashant1@gmail.com>
>>>     <mailto:vermaprashant1@gmail.com>
>>>     Date: Jan 10, 2013 2:20:32 PM
>>>     Subject: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages
>>>     To: schandra@mit.gov.in <mailto:schandra@mit.gov.in>
>>>
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>
>>>     Prashant Verma I  Sr. Software Engineer
>>>     W3C India
>>>     New Delhi
>>>     Cell : +91-8800521042 <tel:%2B91-8800521042>
>>>     Website : http://www.w3cindia.in <http://www.w3cindia.in/>
>>>     --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 23:49:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 3 February 2013 23:49:10 GMT