W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org > April 2013

AW: ISSUE-106: I18N-ISSUE-246: Storage Size

From: Stephan Walter <stephan.walter@cocomore.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 13:11:45 +0000
To: "joerg@bioloom.de" <joerg@bioloom.de>, Yves Savourel <ysavourel@enlaso.com>
CC: "public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3e4ad1e7219c44f88cf7903870d97be2@DB3PR05MB041.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Yves, Jörg,

fine, I hope that this will settle the discussion. 

I spotted three typos:

All the LINE FEED (U+000A) characters of the content to verified are
replaced by the character or characters specified by the line break type.
==>
All the LINE FEED (U+000A) characters of the content to *be* verified are
replaced by the character or characters specified by the line break type.


Note that the string CONTINUE does not fit the specified restriction of 8 bytes. The minimal number of bytes to store such string in UTF-16 is 16.
==>
Note that the string CONTINUE does not fit the specified restriction of 8 bytes. The minimal number of bytes to store such *a* string in UTF-16 is 16.
(Not totally sure about this one...)


The storageSize attribute allows to specify different *the* maximum storage sizes throughout the document.
==>
The storageSize attribute allows to specify different maximum storage sizes throughout the document.

Best regards
Stephan


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Jörg Schütz [mailto:joerg@bioloom.de] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. April 2013 07:36
An: Yves Savourel
Cc: public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
Betreff: Re: ISSUE-106: I18N-ISSUE-246: Storage Size

Hi Yves,

Very good, you covered everything.

Two suggestions:

(1) Rewrite of Note: Storage size is not related to the display length of a text, and therefore should not be used to constrain a certain display length.

(2) First paragraph in 8.21.2: "lf" should have also "(U+000A)" to make the sentence clear.

Cheers -- Jörg

On Apr 03, 2013 at 18:40 (CEST), Yves Savourel wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've tried to re-worked the section taking into account:
>
> - The updates from Jirka and Stephan
> - Anne's feedback (removing NEL from the list of line-break options)
> - Adding some wording related to a) using bytes and b) how to use the information to perform a verification.
>
> I'd like your feedback before I put this into the specification.
> So I've attached a PDF with the new text and one with the new text and revisions marks.
>
> Thanks,
> -yves
>


Received on Thursday, 4 April 2013 13:12:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 4 April 2013 13:13:00 UTC