W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > September 2007

Re: mobileOKBasicDocCheckerSyncTest

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:38:01 -0400
Message-ID: <e920a71c0709181338r1f0a5f8eu81b8d108623cc22a@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Roland Gülle" <roland@7val.com>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker <public-mobileok-checker@w3.org>
Yeah I think that's fine. I mean, don't put yourself to too much
trouble, it's not that important. But it seems nice to be consistent.

Hmm. But then again, we wouldn't want to write a message like "warn:
foo bar baz". It looks wrong in comparison to "Warn: foo bar baz".
"WARN: foo bar baz" seems too different from what the document does.

Arg, thoughts? Let's get this right once.


On 9/18/07, Roland Gülle <roland@7val.com> wrote:
> > The mobileOK document uses 'warn', at least in the last couple drafts:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/mobileOK-basic10-tests/
> >
> > I think this is the intended convention in any event.
> sorry for this confusion, you are right!
> (the mobileOKBasicDocCheckerSyncTest also reports this, but I don't
> understand my own result report...)
> So we have to change the tests (and test-tests).
> Should I do a global sed/awk search-replace session?
>   roland
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:38:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:19 UTC