W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-mobileok-checker@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Some draft code for mobileOK Basic Tests RI

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:42:52 -0500
Message-ID: <e920a71c0702061042w6ce1b2f4w4fc2c101ba29f25e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ignacio Marin" <ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: public-mobileok-checker@w3.org
Ah, we are blessed with several implementations then. I don't want to
duplicate work, but, also think we need one official W3C reference
implementation, and also think there's no reason for anyone else to
stop working on other implementations. I hope we can all have a hand
in the reference implementation so that these implementations come up
with similar answers!

Sounds like we still have several points to discuss about the nature
of the library itself. Once that is settled there are many test
implementations to complete so I'm sure we'll be busy with that.


On 2/6/07, Ignacio Marin <ignacio.marin@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> First of all, sorry for the delay of my answer.
> It was hard to return from a hell of two weeks being away from office.
> I have talked to the people involved in CTIC-TAW initiative (my workmates who presented an alpha version of their MobileOK checker in the F2F in Gijon) and they have just told me about a soon public release of their checker along this month. They have also told me to support the initiative taking place around dev.w3.org so Miguel GarcĂ­a will help on the development of the checker. I think this will be important as he has already fought against the tests for the TAW implementation.
> Abel Rionda will also help developing the checker, so CTIC puts two developers to work on it.
> The rest of the people in CTIC-TAW and myself are already subscribed to the list taking a peek on what happens and giving our opinion.
> We are evaluating the framework kindly offered by Sean so we can decide on which parts to deal with and express an commitment of work to do. Has anybody else already chosen a particular module to work with? If so, we would directly discard it.
> As soon as evaluation is done (this week), we shall report to the list about stuff we are getting involved in.
> Regards,
> Nacho
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2007 18:43:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:21:17 UTC