- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:41:04 -0500
- To: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
- Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, public-microxml@w3.org
Stephen D Green scripsit: > OK, but it rather depends what "accepts... as a work item" means. > >From WG public list / meeting minutes it looks like there is some > reservation in WG about committing to working on the specs: Yes, there is. But "committing to working on the specs", as you have it, and "accepting [MicroXML] as a work item" are the same thing. The WG has not yet done that. If they do, the spec will be out of the CG's hands; if not, it won't. The purpose at this time is simply to see if anyone on the CG is unalterably opposed to the *possibility* of WG takeup, and it doesn't seem so. -- The first thing you learn in a lawin' family John Cowan is that there ain't no definite answers cowan@ccil.org to anything. --Calpurnia in To Kill A Mockingbird
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 16:41:31 UTC