W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Error recovery

From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 13:26:39 +0000
Message-ID: <CAA0AChVgbfe2e-q9PGvNudsUkYunPPFT44GbR+M+XLetL8DzBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Cc: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>, public-microxml@w3.org
No joke intended. Just relaying the pressure to conform to the growing
agile trend. And if the parser developers are mainly going to be agile
developers with agile implementers/customers then maybe the spec should be
agile too (in as much as a spec can be agile).
----
Stephen D Green



On 19 November 2012 11:47, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:

> On 19.11.2012 12:18, Stephen D Green wrote:
> > Regarding specification  style: How about the error handling spec being
> > maintained as a "living standard"?
>
> Err, might be it's just Monday morning and I haven't discovered that
> this is joke.
>
> But if various parsers should behave same when recovering errors, then
> they must be based on the same stable specification. So I would expect
> once error handling spec is developed, enough feedback is gathered then
> it should be "frozen".
>
>                                 Jirka
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>        Professional XML consulting and training services
>   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 13:27:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 19 November 2012 13:27:31 GMT