W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > November 2012

Re: The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on

From: James Fuller <jim@webcomposite.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 10:24:08 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEaz5mvpMahfuMFALSiwWW7zpLhAzT+gx2RroTSw3wDzhHe7ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: stephengreenubl@gmail.com
Cc: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
+1

J

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Stephen D Green
<stephengreenubl@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
> ----
> Stephen D Green
>
>
>
> On 15 November 2012 23:48, Michael Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net> wrote:
>>
>> what he said - go forth with my blessing, may it keep the dogs at bay,
>> grease the wheels, and generally extend the metaphor
>>
>>
>> On 11/14/2012 8:36 PM, David Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> I am quite pleased with the work done in this Community WG and would
>>> support moving it from community to a real WG.
>>>
>>> So:  +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> David Lee
>>> Lead Engineer
>>> MarkLogic Corporation
>>> dlee@marklogic.com
>>> Phone: +1 812-482-5223
>>> Cell:  +1 812-630-7622
>>> www.marklogic.com
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:33 PM
>>> To: public-microxml@w3.org
>>> Subject: The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on
>>>
>>> The W3C XML Core WG <http://www.w3.org/XML/Core> discussed MicroXML
>>> briefly last week at a face-to-face meeting, and at more length today on the
>>> phone.  I belong to the WG, but didn't attend the F2F.
>>>
>>> Since there hasn't been a posting here for more than a month, and no
>>> changes to the draft for six weeks, the Core WG would like to know if anyone
>>> on this Community Group objects to transferring further work on the MicroXML
>>> specification itself to the Core WG in hopes that it will eventually lead to
>>> a W3C Recommendation.  Other possible work items such as MicroAF,
>>> MicroExamplotron, and Automatic Namespaces would remain in the hands of this
>>> group.
>>>
>>> This does not constitute any sort of commitment by the Core WG to
>>> actually work on MicroXML, of course.  However, its charter will be renewed
>>> next month, so this is a good moment to add MicroXML as an optional work
>>> item.
>>>
>>> If there are any objections, please post them here or email me privately,
>>> or in the alternative communicate with Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>.
>>> Giving reasons would be a Good Thing.
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 09:24:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 November 2012 09:24:39 GMT