W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-microxml@w3.org > November 2012

Re: The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on

From: Stephen D Green <stephengreenubl@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:20:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CAA0AChWuaqJQZV=uaSB9Vf11ML+o4VLxUEnTwi00duJ4_ZOsyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "public-microxml@w3.org" <public-microxml@w3.org>
Cc: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
+1
----
Stephen D Green



On 15 November 2012 23:48, Michael Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net> wrote:

> what he said - go forth with my blessing, may it keep the dogs at bay,
> grease the wheels, and generally extend the metaphor
>
>
> On 11/14/2012 8:36 PM, David Lee wrote:
>
>> I am quite pleased with the work done in this Community WG and would
>> support moving it from community to a real WG.
>>
>> So:  +1
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------**------------------------------**
>> -----------------
>> David Lee
>> Lead Engineer
>> MarkLogic Corporation
>> dlee@marklogic.com
>> Phone: +1 812-482-5223
>> Cell:  +1 812-630-7622
>> www.marklogic.com
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan@ccil.org] On Behalf Of John Cowan
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:33 PM
>> To: public-microxml@w3.org
>> Subject: The dogs bark, but the caravan moves on
>>
>> The W3C XML Core WG <http://www.w3.org/XML/Core> discussed MicroXML
>> briefly last week at a face-to-face meeting, and at more length today on
>> the phone.  I belong to the WG, but didn't attend the F2F.
>>
>> Since there hasn't been a posting here for more than a month, and no
>> changes to the draft for six weeks, the Core WG would like to know if
>> anyone on this Community Group objects to transferring further work on the
>> MicroXML specification itself to the Core WG in hopes that it will
>> eventually lead to a W3C Recommendation.  Other possible work items such as
>> MicroAF, MicroExamplotron, and Automatic Namespaces would remain in the
>> hands of this group.
>>
>> This does not constitute any sort of commitment by the Core WG to
>> actually work on MicroXML, of course.  However, its charter will be renewed
>> next month, so this is a good moment to add MicroXML as an optional work
>> item.
>>
>> If there are any objections, please post them here or email me privately,
>> or in the alternative communicate with Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>.
>> Giving reasons would be a Good Thing.
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 09:21:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 November 2012 09:21:53 GMT