RE: MicroXML and Json


> > This is another good example of where MicroXML is
> > already in use without being named or specified.
> 
> And not needed at all. XML already does that job.
> 
> H.

Also irrelevant.  If MicroXML is a true subset of XML then it is not "needed"  ... in the sense you can do anything in XML you can do in MicroXML,
q.e.d.

What is relevant IMHO is if it is "useful"

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Lee
Lead Engineer
MarkLogic Corporation
dlee@marklogic.com
Phone: +1 650-287-2531
Cell:  +1 812-630-7622
www.marklogic.com

Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 14:27:05 UTC