- From: Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 10:27:15 -0400
- To: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Cc: MicroXML <public-microxml@w3.org>
On 8/15/2012 2:35 AM, Dave Pawson wrote: > On 14 August 2012 16:31, John Cowan<cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: >> Uche Ogbuji scripsit: >> >>> But you're just saying go back to XML 1.0, where an attribute has a name, >>> and that name can include a colon, and there's nothing special in the data >>> model about a name with a colon (except that "xml:" is reserved). >> That is what my draft says also. >> >>> I'd have to think about this, and in particular the consequence of having >>> MicroXML documents not XMLNS compatible. You're right that we have not set >>> XMLNS compat as a goal, but I admit that considering such a large break >>> does give me pause. >> So it should; let us all think hard about this. > > Micro == simpler? xmlns isn't simple (see the various lists for proof of this). > > for me, No to xmlns compatibility. > I call this position the "Freedom from Namespace Declaration," and I subscribe to it. -Mike
Received on Friday, 17 August 2012 14:27:53 UTC