W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > June 2013

Re: is spec complete?

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:32:04 +1000
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2k9+7Pqhj5u0p7RsYVS87q8bWDKQtkpKZzWBo63bEAuVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Cc: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Thanks, that's what I was after.
Did you notice, though, that name and track examples are being used in
the REC doc [1], even though the specification for these have been
removed? REC looks a bit inconsistent because of that.

Anyway - I think it's best to reference the CR doc in the HTML spec
because of this.

Thanks,
Silvia.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/

On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 5:45 AM, RaphaŽl Troncy
<raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> wrote:
> Dear Silvia,
>
>
>> I've just had a look at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ and found
>> that the section on named fragment URIs is completely gone. Is the
>> spec that is at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ actually complete?
>> Where else is there a spec that is complete (i.e. has all the sections
>> that we originally authored)? I'm asking because I've seen arguments
>> being made that there is no such thing as named media fragments and
>> therefore no such thing will be recommended to be implemented in
>> browsers.
>> Can somebody please clarify?
>
>
> The Named and Track dimensions are out of the recommendation which is the
> (basic) version of Media Fragments URI 1.0, per group decision.
> You need to have a look at the (advanced) Media Fragments URI 1.0 (group
> note) to get those dimensions described, e.g.
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-media-frags-20111201/
>
>   RaphaŽl
>
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
> Multimedia Communications Department
> 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Monday, 10 June 2013 22:32:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:48 UTC