W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [css3-images] Features Overview

From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:59:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4E8C1C55.4050505@eurecom.fr>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Dear Tab, Fantasai,

>> Follow-up of this thread, the Editor Draft now states (section 4.2.2),
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-space:
>>
>> "Note that in the case of pixel-based clipping areas, application of those
>> areas to multi-resolutions visual media is unsupported. More generally,
>> pixel-clip an image that does not have a single well defined pixel
>> resolution (width and height) is not recommended."
>>
>> Do you agree with this reformulation?
>
> What does "not supported" imply?  Does it just give the entire image
> then, ignoring the "fragment" part of the request entirely?
>
> If so, that's fine with me.  I request that it be stated something
> more like the following, though:
>
> "If the clipping region is pixel-based and the image is
> multi-resolution (like an ICO file), the fragment MUST be ignored, so
> that the url represents the entire image."
>
> This specifies a specific, testable behavior.

I would like to let you know that your suggested rephrasing has been 
included in the specification, see 
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-space. 
We have assumed that we have addressed your comments in our disposal of 
comments now that this document is transitioning to Candidate 
Recommendation.
Best regards.

   Raphaël

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 08:59:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 5 October 2011 08:59:48 GMT