- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:59:01 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Dear Tab, Fantasai, >> Follow-up of this thread, the Editor Draft now states (section 4.2.2), >> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-space: >> >> "Note that in the case of pixel-based clipping areas, application of those >> areas to multi-resolutions visual media is unsupported. More generally, >> pixel-clip an image that does not have a single well defined pixel >> resolution (width and height) is not recommended." >> >> Do you agree with this reformulation? > > What does "not supported" imply? Does it just give the entire image > then, ignoring the "fragment" part of the request entirely? > > If so, that's fine with me. I request that it be stated something > more like the following, though: > > "If the clipping region is pixel-based and the image is > multi-resolution (like an ICO file), the fragment MUST be ignored, so > that the url represents the entire image." > > This specifies a specific, testable behavior. I would like to let you know that your suggested rephrasing has been included in the specification, see http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-spec/#naming-space. We have assumed that we have addressed your comments in our disposal of comments now that this document is transitioning to Candidate Recommendation. Best regards. Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2011 08:59:47 UTC