W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Range equivalence (was Re: 5th F2F meeting: second day summary)

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:58:14 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02831003161358k4759a130se62ebaf17a827793@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Cc: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, RaphaŽl Troncy wrote:
>> # A new header named 'Content-Range-Mapping' will be introduced, which
>> purpose is to expressed a mapping of a Content Range between 2 units (e.g.
>> bytes and seconds)
> Range processing can't introduce new entity headers

Can you explain why? There is no existing infrastructure for any range
handling other than bytes, so if our range handling requires an
additional, informative header, why sholdn't it be possible to
introduce it?

Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 20:59:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:52:44 UTC