Re: The problem of having multiple Content-Range headers in HTTP response from Yves Lafon on 2010-03-05 (public-media-fragment@w3.org from March 2010)

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:50:00 -0500 (EST)
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
cc: Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org>, raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1003051048070.21692@wnl.j3.bet>

On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:

> Thanks for clarifying - it's good to read and understand these things
> thoroughly. I was indeed wondering how Microsoft's scheme could work
> when they in fact used commas.
Btw "Cookie" is using a comma even if it is not permitted by the spec, 
requiring special handling and caring by proxies to be sure that there is 
no folding or split of that specific header.

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves

Received on Friday, 5 March 2010 15:50:03 UTC